托福高分范文：针对25岁小孩的广告是否应该被禁止.docx

《托福高分范文：针对25岁小孩的广告是否应该被禁止.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《托福高分范文：针对25岁小孩的广告是否应该被禁止.docx（2页珍藏版）》请在第一文库网上搜索。

1、托福高分范文：针对25岁小孩的广告是否应该被禁止针对2-5岁小孩做的广告是否应该被禁止。注意题目里有个特定人群（2-5岁小孩），可以结合他们的特点来找观点理由。托福写作文章框架1 .开头：不同意（不应该禁止这种广告）。2 .论证段1：广告不会影响孩子的消费观，因为2-5岁孩子太小，对消费没什么概念，看广告只是一种娱乐。3 .论证段2：广告也不会导致孩子乱花钱，因为在这个年龄段，都是家长替孩子消费，所以这些广告其实是针对家长的而不是针对孩子的。4 .结尾：针对小孩子的广告不应该被禁止。托福写作范文Thatte1evision,especia11ycommercia1s,isbad,however

2、ambiguous1yandbroad1ythattermisdefined,forchi1dren,sdeve1opment,isamisconceptionsharedbymanyyoungparents.Tobemorespecific,theycontendthatbeingexposedtoTVcommercia1swi11insti11inyoungchi1drenawrongsenseofconsumerismorencouragethemtospendmoneyirresponsib1y,a1though,whenexaminingtheargumentscarefu11y,w

3、eseethatneitherho1dswater.Inthefirstp1ace,itishigh1ypossib1ethatTVcommercia1smayinsti11asenseofconsumerism,thattheycanbuywhateverthey1ikeas1ongastheycanaffordit,evenifithasnouti1itywhatsoever,inchi1drenagedtwotofive,providedthattheyhavewhatcou1dcommon1yandscientifica11ybedescribedasa“sense”ofanythin

4、g.Thattheydonot.Apparent1ytheaveragecognitiveabi1ityofatodd1erisnotsubstantia11ymoreappreciab1ethanthatofac1evergibbon,bywhichImeanthattheyrespondprimari1ytovisua1andaudiostimu1i,suchasvibrantco1ors,cuteimages,andp1easantsounds,ratherthana1ogisticpersuasion.Forexamp1e,whenayoungchi1drenc1apshisorher

5、handhappi1ybecauseheorsheseesanotherchi1d,inaTVcommercia1,gorgeshappi1yoncandy,heorsheisprobab1yemphasizingwith,or“madehappyby”,aimageorsound,whichisnomoredifferentthanatodd1erhearingsomeonegigg1einaweird1yhigh-pitchedvoice.Itisnotbecauseheorsheconscientious1y“wants”tobuythecandy.Therefore,evenifach

6、i1disconsistent1ystimu1atedbycommercia1stargetedatyoungchi1dren,thereisnoactua1worrythatheorshemay“pickup“ofaspendthrifthabit.Andifnot,thereisnogroundforbanningTVcommercia1s.Furthermore,equa11yneg1igib1eistheworrythatchi1drenmaybemotivatedtospendextravagant1y,forthesimp1ereasonthatyoungchi1dren,atth

7、eageoftwoorfive,area1mostuniversa11ynota11owedtocontro1money.Thinkofa11thepurchasesofkidproductsourparentsmadeovertheyears.Whoboughta11thosethings?Itwastheparentswhomighthaveearnest1ybe1ievedthattheywerebuyingsomethingwe1ikedorneeded,asopposedtothechi1dren,asindividua1consumers,whomadethedecisions.T

8、herefore,whi1etheparentsmightbe1ievethatTVcommercia1sappea1edtousztheyactua11yappea1edtothem.Theywere1ead,bythecommercia1s,tobe1ievethattheyshou1dspendacertainamountofmoney,foruszonanItemofcertainva1uethatrendersthecostworthwhi1e.WhatIamarguingis,thus,thatthereisneverTVcommercia1stargetedspecifica11

9、ythechi1drentobeginwith.Instead,theywerecommercia1saboutchi1dren,targetedspecifica11ytoparentswhocou1dspendmoneyonbeha1fofchi1dren.Assuch,whatthestatementisproposingisbanningTVcommercia1sthattargetacertaingroupofadu1ts,which,withoutsaying,isridicu1ous.Inconc1usion,basedontheaforementionedreasons,itshou1dcomeasnosurprisethatIdonotsharethesentimentintheorigina1statement.